Neo-Fundamentalism
As one of my previous, and since removed, posts has made clear, I’m not going to be calling out ministries by name, unless I feel it extremely necessary. However, that isn’t to say that I don’t enjoy smart people making dumb people look…well…dumb.
Some of the best feeds in my reader are contemplative, coherant, well thought out, critical analysis of some of the Neo-Fundamentalist blogs out there. Don’t know what a neo-fundamentalist is? No problem.
A new addition to my feed reader has the answer.
JesusCreed.org seems to have a firm grasp on reality. They give one of the best descriptions of the watchdog, “reformed”, neo-fundamentalist websites out there. He starts by saying,
I was reared in a Fundamentalist church, and we were incredibly proud of it. We were strident, largely uneducated (even dismissive of education), theologically censorious, separatistic, intolerant, and accusatory of every smidgeon of slight alteration. There were no questions; there were answers — and we had them. We saw our abrasiveness as a sign that the rest of the world couldn’t count the cost; rejection proved we were right. I’m embarrassed today mostly about what we were like as humans - we were ungracious if not unchristian.
WOW! What a paragraph! I could NEVER have said it better myself. I simply have nothing more to add to that paragraph. He goes on to say,
There is a conviction among Neo-Fundamentalists that one can’t err if one gets too conservative, but that is the sin of what I called “zealotry.”
OK, I do have something to add here. There is a misunderstanding among Christians, of yesterday and today, that the more conservative we are, the more pleasing to God we are. You just can’t go wrong if you’re too far right.
I have a serious beef with that. Neo-fundamentalists may claim that there is no danger in being ultra-conservative, but they’d be wrong. I like how he calls it the “sin of…zealotry”. Indeed it is a sin, because calling something that is NOT a sin, a sin, is not right. In fact, it’s a sin ![]()
Anyway, take a look at the article. It is truly an eye-opener.
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always have these articles delivered to your email inbox every day. Click here to sign up.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
Comments
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: show_manual_subscription_form() in /nfs/c03/h05/mnt/48320/domains/nathanrice.org/html/wp-content/themes/ElegantBlue/comments.php on line 108

That description you quoted was frighteningly accurate. Sadly, I’ve met too many extreme conservatives who seem to enjoy conflict and like to assume that you disagree with them, because then they can call you a liberal and ignore the rest of your arguments. Some also seem to have the opinion that people who believe in education/science are the natural enemies of the church, and refuse to see the larger perspective.
Yes, there are a lot of people waking up and smelling the coffee….too bad all of them are on the internet, and I don’t actually know any of them in real life.
William,
I had no idea you read this blog!
I’m a frequent visitor to reformingbaptist.
I hope the term “reformed” used in a sort of pejorative context above didn’t offend you. I realize that you are reformed, yet I know that you are one of the least vicious “reformed” bloggers out there, and I truly appreciate that.
Thanks for stopping by to leave a note.
Nathan